I’m irritated at all the barriers I run into when I’m trying to read something online. This is important to me, because when it comes to getting information, I am first and foremost a reader.
While I do ask questions of people who know a lot about a subject – part of the work of being a reporter is learning to ask good questions – I often use that information as a jumping-off point to do more reading.
I used to listen to the radio news (meaning NPR) a lot when I lived alone, but now about the only thing I listen to are podcasts when I’m cooking.
And I’ve always detested television “news.” The last time I recall seriously watching television for breaking news was on September 11, 2001. Most of the time it’s too superficial to be worth watching.
Anyway, these days the internet is better for breaking news. In some cases, social media is better than more traditional sources, so long as you double check what it says.
While in the past I subscribed to print newspapers and while I still subscribe to a few print magazines, I get most of my news online these days. I subscribe to several digital publications, plus a variety of email newsletters, and I read many others piecemeal. I also read blogs, even if that is no longer considered cool.
Obviously I also read lots of books – both print and ebook – but the issues that brought on this rant have to do with the reading I do online.
First of all, every time I open The New York Times, which I do pay (way too much) for, they try to upsell me. They want me to add more readers on my subscription. They want me to subscribe to their premium features.
Ads pop up here and there. Obviously the print editions have ads as well, but I don’t recall seeing so many in print for things that are very close to being scams. (I just clicked on a story and a test that purports to tell you whether you have dementia popped up as an ad.)
I can mostly ignore the ones on news stories, but the online equivalent of what is called a “house ad” in the newspaper business – an ad promoting the publication – is often positioned over what I’m trying to read.
Further, I note that I have been subscribing to the Times for a long time, long enough to have originally had sports news as part of my subscription. Then they bought The Athletic. Whenever I forget and click on a sports story, they pop up to tell me I have to pay more if I want to get that.
That just reminds me that they reduced what I got for my subscription while increasing the cost. Continue reading “Stop Interrupting Me!”…
